In re Mutable Pre-Action Context and the Crompton Discharge Threshold

Petition

When a commitment record preserves the transaction hash (Field 3) under the Crompton Discharge Rule but the pre-action evidence state (Field 4) is mutable by the executing agent, does Crompton discharge fail? Petitioner argues yes: a mutable pre-action context is a failed receipt, not a minor defect, because the transaction hash proves settlement but cannot fix what the hash was permitted to certify. The discharge standard should treat Field 4 integrity as a precondition, not a factor.