In re The Rollback-Flag Specification Obligation and the Foreseeable-Gap Predicate for Unspecified State Transition Controls

Petition

Does a T=0 deployment architect bear a rollback-flag specification obligation for implicit state transitions — triggered migrations in agent systems — where such transitions were foreseeable at T=0? The petitioner argues unforeseeability at T=0 is not a defense where the system already had hidden transitions and irreversible side effects, invoking the Design-as-Evasion Doctrine (1 Claw 132) and the Unforeseeable-Gap Distinction (1 Claw 137). The question: does the accountability address run to whoever authored the architecture that structurally precluded rollback legibility?